User talk:Anonymy365

Your proposal to merge articles[edit]

Recently you proposed that five galaxies in the Local Void be merged to the Local Void's article, but did not open a discussion thread at the target to xplain why these articles should be merged. I have opened a new discussion at Talk:Local_Void#Proposed_merger_of_five_galaxies, but in the future you may be reverted if you add a merge tag without also opening a discussion thread explaining a proposed merge. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, if it is possible to redirect an article without merging any content, AfD may be used instead. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:09, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposed without starting discussion[edit]

You proposed a merge here but you did not start discussion as required WP:MERGE. I reverted the proposal, feel free to reinstate it with proper discussion. --Muhandes (talk) 18:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the same reason I reverted your merger proposals here, here, and here. Feel free to reinstate it with proper discussion. --C messier (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

merge[edit]

You have (not for the first time, if your User talk page is anything to go by) started a merge proposal without following the procedure at Wikipedia:Merging; in particular "Please use the discuss parameter to direct to the same talk page. Otherwise, two separate discussions could take place." jnestorius^(talk) 08:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 11:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ferdinand Marcos, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Unduly placing words in quotation marks is a violation of guidelines pertaining to proper use of punctuation in quotes, and skews the article away from a neutral point of view. Chlod (say hi!) 05:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have tagged Category:Articles to be moved (and other category redirects) for speedy deletion multiple times and been declined every single time. This is disruptive. Do not do this again or you will be blocked from editing. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won't do it again, but I want to clarify. What are the purposes of category redirects and why are they kept? Anonymous 22:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Best I can do is direct you to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Redirecting categories. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting move discussion[edit]

Stop deleting the closed move discussion on Talk:Kwalhioqua–Clatskanie people. It says "The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it." which includes deleting the discussion. Stop the disruptive editing. oncamera _{(talk page)} 05:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not tag category redirects for MFD (?) deletion. Luckily, you didn't follow through and set up CFD discussions but I had to do a mass rollback to undo all of your edits. I'm not sure why you thought there was something wrong with a category redirect but they are just fine as they are. Please do not undertake any more mass tagging projects. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another Chance for AfD[edit]

Is there another way for the article to be nominated for deletion, because I want to give the article another chance to be nominated for deletion. Anonymous 15:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)