2004 Democratic Party vice presidential candidate selection is within the scope of WikiProject Joe Biden, a project dedicated to creating and improving content related to Joe Biden. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Joe BidenWikipedia:WikiProject Joe BidenTemplate:WikiProject Joe BidenJoe Biden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is almost completely unsourced. For most of these people, where is the evidence that they were ever under consideration for the VP nomination? And why are ineligible people like Jennifer Granholm even mentioned? --Metropolitan90 21:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bill Clinton NOT ineligible to be president?[edit]
Former President Bill Clinton is listed among "Ineligible VP choices". I do not think he is ineligible to become President again, but he could only do so by the legal-but-unlikely route of coming in through the prescribed line of succession. He can not be ELECTED president anymore, because that's already happened twice and the 22nd Amendment specifically bars being elected more than twice. Maybe things would get sticky if he was nominated for vice president and something happened to the presidential nominee? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]