Template talk:Did you know/Approved/week-3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the page of all the approved nominations for the "Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the fourth-most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the post-expand include size limit.

Qin Huasun[edit]

Created by Toadboy123 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 32 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Toadboy123 (talk) 12:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Not interesting and a coatrack, since Huasun is surely not the person who made these decisions. (t · c) buidhe 00:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Buidhe: As Qin represented his country in the UNSC, he made the decision based on his country's political position. However, prior to 2011, China's vetoes in the UNSC were rare and only four times [1] were it used prior to the start of the 21st century. Since the mentioned vetoes were related to sending peacekeeping troops, it might be interesting as the users would look into the article to see why the peacekeeping resolutions were vetoed. However, if you any ideas for another hook in the article or if I should modify it in a certain phrasing, I am happy to consider that. - Toadboy123 (talk) 09:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
      • Yes, I know how the UN works. Certainly the hook phrasing makes it sound like a coatrack. Frankly not all articles are suited for DYK and this one may not be. Peacekeeping is not inherently dull but UN resolutions can be, especially if there is no real information what the vote is really about. Furthermore, the article as it stands does not qualify due to sourcing. (t · c) buidhe 13:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Buidhe: Is there anything that I should do to improve the article such as adding more reliable sources or expanding the information regarding the reasons of the vetoed resolutions so that the article can be featured in DYK ? Or does the article does not have the information much needed for the DYK? I can improve the article based on your suggestions but if you feel there is no room for it in DYK then you can cancel this nomination. - Toadboy123 (talk) 02:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
          • @Buidhe: I have added detailed information on the vetoed UN resolutions. Let me know if anything more has to be done. - Toadboy123 (talk) 06:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
  • Since I have not heard any response from the previous reviewer, can a new reviewer check the updates to the hook I made and if it is good to go? - Toadboy123 (talk) 03:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Much to whinge about here I'm afraid. As written, the biography section would deserve {{subsections}}, and much of its early paragraphs can feel more than a bit WP:Proseline at times and would deserve {{prose}}. None of the hook has an end-of-sentence citation, and given that WP:CLUMP says that "more than three [references] should generally be avoided", I'm not going through four. Take your time, and ping me when these are remedied.--Launchballer 10:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I have made the edits to the article based on the suggestions you made. Check and let me know if it is good to go now. - Toadboy123 (talk) 02:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
It's a bit better, but you need a cite for "February 2000".--Launchballer 14:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Added citation. Let me know if all is good now. - Toadboy123 (talk) 03:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ready to roll.--Launchballer 08:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pulled hook per interestingness of hook issue brought up at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Prep 2. SL93 (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SL93: In that case, you can terminate this hook. - Toadboy123 (talk) 02:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reopening per WT:DYK.--Launchballer 08:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hind's Hall[edit]

Macklemore performing in 2022
Macklemore performing in 2022
Created by Makeandtoss (talk) and Dippiljemmy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 40 past nominations.

Makeandtoss (talk) 13:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Thought I might see this here. You do need to remedy that {{expand}} tag before this can go anywhere.--Launchballer 13:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, fixed. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Full review needed.--Launchballer 14:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will be taking this review. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I've replaced the image of Hind with an image of Macklemore due to it being fair use, sorry :( Pass. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not so fast. Hooks must not be likely to change, and "recently" will date.--Launchballer 14:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced "recently" with "January 2024". Makeandtoss (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My concern has been resolved.--Launchballer 15:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From Template:Did you know/Preparation area 3:
Where does this article explicitly say that the song refers to Hind? @Makeandtoss, LunaEclipse, and Bruxton:--Launchballer 09:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that the title of Macklemore's song "Hind's Hall" refers to the renaming of Hamilton Hall in honor of Hind Rajab, a six-year-old Palestinian girl who was killed in the Gaza Strip in January 2024?
Issues addressed. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 09:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The new hook only appears in the lead and is not sourced in the body.--Launchballer 10:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that Macklemore's song "Hind's Hall" inspired an online mass blocking movement of celebrities on social media?
@Launchballer: I think this should work, as the statement above is cited in the body. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 11:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's cited to WP:NEWSWEEK, which is not generally reliable.--Launchballer 12:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've pulled this from prep. Newsweek should not be in the article at all, and upon checking the source, it isn't in there. Discussion should continue here.--Launchballer 12:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I have removed the newsweek info and ref. The original hook is currently both in the lede and the body so this should be good to go. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Makeandtoss: Sorry, I only just saw this. You're right, ALT0 is in the lead and body, but it needs an end-of-sentence citation.--Launchballer 10:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: Done, thanks. Makeandtoss (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather it was in the main body, but technically this isn't a DYK issue, so let's try this again.--Launchballer 12:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zer0[edit]

  • ... that Apex Legends player Zer0 is considered by many to be the game's best In-Game Leader in professional competitions?
Created by Soulbust (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 36 past nominations.

Soulbust (talk) 23:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Waiting on QPQ. Prefer ALT1. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Soulbust and BeanieFan11: There's a chunk of unsourced content in the Team Falcons section which needs to be cited before this can be promoted. Also, what makes refs 1, 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 26, and 28 (the tweets and YouTube) reliable?--Launchballer 13:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Didn't see an unsourced chunk, but just a sentence that mentions Zer0 will maintain his IGL role for the new team. In any case, I added the proper source for that now. Addressing the sources you brought up:
Ref 1 (tweet from DarkZero and sources just his birth day & month);
Ref 3 (Video from his former org Reignite, sourcing himself stating his name),
Ref 4 (another esports org (FFL/Fennel) interviewing Zer0, this just sources himself saying he is from Brisbane),
Ref 5 (this is just EXO Clan announcing their roster addition of Zer0),
Ref 11 (this is an official ALGS esports account to source Zer0 winning MVP of a tournament),
Ref 12 (this is Reignite announcing the departure of Zer0, added to source the exact 4 July 2022 date mentioned in article)
Ref 26 (this is sourcing an interview where Zer0 himself states he himself had a reputation of choking match points)
Ref 28 (this is an additional source to reference Zer0 being discussed as one of the best IGLs in the world, with source being from a post-tournament interview of Zer0 and posted onto the aforementioned official ALGS esports account from Ref. 11)
I fail to see the issue with any of these sources and how they would not be reliable? None of the information Zer0 states about himself (Refs. 3, 4, 26) is in violation of WP:SELFSOURCE. Ref 1 is also not in violation of that. The other sources are just citing official roster announcements (Ref 5, 12), or are from an official account of the sport's organizing body (Refs 11 and 28). I don't see how the use of these sources, particularly for what they are citing are in violation of WP:PRIMARY, for example. Soulbust (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. I won't promote while there are five hooks in the bottom set, but this is ready.--Launchballer 16:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ryoko Kui[edit]

Created by Ornithoptera (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 30 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Ornithoptera (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting short article; it is well-sourced and well-written. I prefer the original hook over ALT1. My only suggestion is that mangaka should be unlinked per policy on consecutive Wikilinks and changed to "manga artist" for clarity's sake. Yue🌙 23:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ornithoptera and Yue: What makes the hooks WP:DYKINTeresting?--Launchballer 10:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Apologies, I likely missed the absence of an explicit point of general interest because of my own interest in the series. I am unable to word the original hook in a way that is sound and under the character limit. I propose this alteration of ALT1, if you will, ALT2:
... that in addition to her popular manga series Delicious in Dungeon, Ryoko Kui has drawn fan art of the computer role-playing games Baldur's Gate series, Pathfinder and Planescape: Torment?
Marginally better, although I'd expect a more merciless prepbuilder to end it at 'games' and cut the 'the'. I don't plan on promoting any more hooks while there are five hooks in the bottom set, but if you've got anything else, I might as well hear it.--Launchballer 20:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kortnei Johnson[edit]

  • Reviewed: No needed.
Created by Habst (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Habst (talk) 20:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]


Comment: I added an alternative hook since the American state is mentioned twice so it won't be classified as redundancy. Also, "home town" is combined since it's one word.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Good nomination hook, added a comment about it (look above), and no-unlikely violation from Earwig. Good job. — JuanGLP (talk/contribs) 02:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JuanGLP, thank you, I prefer your hook so I have struck mine. Also, the reason for "unlikely" from Earwig is because the 22.5% similarity is coming from a quote in the "Career" section, properly enclosed in quotes and attributed via citation. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Thanks, --Habst (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To eliminate redundancy of the word "train", perhaps the last three words "to train on" could be removed? --Habst (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Habst, yep there is no problem with Earwig, good thing it's cited with adequate sourcing. Also, good eye for the redundancy part of "train" and have fixed the nominated hook. Just checked it off as approved, and congrats if promoted! — JuanGLP (talk/contribs) 23:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Modern Mephistopheles[edit]

  • Source: Cheney, Edna Dow (2010). Louisa May Alcott: Her Life, Letters, and Journals. Carlisle, Massachussetts, USA: Applewood Books. ISBN 978-1-4290-4460-8. “Went for some weeks to the Bellevue, and wrote ‘A Modern Mephistopheles’ for the No Name Series. It has been simmering ever since I read Faust last year. Enjoyed doing it, being tired of providing moral pap for the young.” (Page 296)
Sanderson, Rena (1991). "A Modern Mephistopheles: Louisa May Alcott's Exorcism of Patriarchy". American Transcendental Quarterly. 5 (1): 41–55. ProQuest 1302638905. “After the book’s completion, Alcott commented in her journal that she ‘enjoyed doing it, being tired of providing moral pap for the young.’” (Page 41)
    • ALT1: ... that Louisa May Alcott wrote A Modern Mephistopheles as part of an anonymous series in which readers were meant to guess the author? Source: Cheney, Edna Dow (2010). Louisa May Alcott: Her Life, Letters, and Journals. Carlisle, Massachussetts, USA: Applewood Books. ISBN 978-1-4290-4460-8. “‘A Modern Mephistopheles’ was written among the earlier volumes of the No Name Series, when the chief idea of the authors was to puzzle their readers by disguising their style as much as possible, that they might enjoy the guessing and criticism as each novel appeared. This book was very successful in preserving its incognito; and many persons still insist that it could not have been written by the author of ‘Little Women.’” (Cheney 379, quoting Louisa May Alcott)
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: Link for Cheney: https://books.google.com/books?id=wu4x7eZ2IccC. Link for Sanderson: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1302638905 (may require a subscription)
Created by Heidi Pusey BYU (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 18:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: New enough, long enough, Earwig notes no copyvio. Hook is interesting but would be better if the exact quote was used in the article at the end of the "background" section or as a quote within the citation. ALT1 would be fine and I prefer it as more "hooky". Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can go ahead and do ALT1. Thank you for reviewing this! P.S. I inserted the quote in the background section. I meant to do it earlier but forgot, so thank you for the reminder. Heidi Pusey BYU (talk) 17:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Levi Drake Rodriguez[edit]

  • ... that football player Levi Drake Rodriguez, considered small for his position, went on an "eat-as-much-as-humanly-possible diet" to be noticed by NFL teams?
  • Source: articles in The Athletic (1 2)
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 179 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough. Long enough. 5x expansion. Reliable inline citations throughout. I couldn't check citations #1 and #2 (in The Athletic) as they're behind the paywall. Other citations do check out. AGF on the sources. Hook is interesting but it's cited to the Athletic; so AGF here too. A couple of issues: (1) his height is listed as 6-4 and also as 6-2. (6-2 was added by User Dogloverr16 on May 14th; his two sources are in conflict as well.) Issue #2: QPQ not yet done. Hybernator (talk) 00:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Hybernator: The Athletic articles should be viewable here and here. I'll make sure to get to the other issues soon. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • BeanieFan11, the two Athletic articles you posted are for your citation #2 (both by Kaylin Kahler). Citation #1 (Dane Brugler) still isn't there. The hook's quote isn't in either of Kahler's articles. AGF on #1 as of now. Hybernator (talk) 03:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • The two issues above have been fixed. Citation #1 is still behind the paywall so, the hook is still AGF. GTG. Hybernator (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Hybernator: Noting that I had based the hook based on the sources I linked. This mentions him eating "well under his eat-as-much-as-humanly-possible diet" on NFL Draft day, whereas the other one starts off talking about how he has to eat large amounts to get noticed by the NFL. Thoughts? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the additional info. Until citation #1 is verified, I'm afraid, it'll have to be on AGF. Thanks. Hybernator (talk) 03:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Banducci[edit]

Moved to mainspace by GMH Melbourne (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article was moved to mainspace today, so is new enough. At just over 1800 characters, it is long enough. The article properly uses in-line citations and the copyvio detector finds nothing outside of groups and positions. The hook is interesting and cited inline. The QPQ has been done. The only thing I'll note is that there's certainly sources out there to beef up the article more, including recent contempt threats and just older general news articles about him. Anyways, looks good to go. SilverserenC 00:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GMH Melbourne and Silver seren: What makes this dude notable, given there are only three references and one of them's Woolworths' annual report (and the other two are from the same day)?--Launchballer 14:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted in my review, there's a large number of other sources about him that could be added and I highly suggested the nominator do so. SilverserenC 20:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Without which this would deserve (at minimum) {{refimprove}}. I must see some more relevant sources in the article before I promote this.--Launchballer 21:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer, I've added a couple of references to the article to assist GMH Melbourne. Is it good enough now to meet requirements? SilverserenC 01:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's much better. I won't promote while there are five hooks in the bottom set, but this is ready.--Launchballer 08:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Wilson (Arkansas politician)[edit]

  • Reviewed:
Created by QuicoleJR (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

QuicoleJR (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Article seems in a good enough state all around. The hook checks out and is certainly good enough; I might mentioned that he was reelected to the house afterwards though! Left some comments on the talk on how this article might be improved or expanded. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1: ... that after being expelled from the Arkansas House of Representatives for killing another representative in a knife fight on 5 December 1838, John Wilson was re-admitted in 1840? (And it is 5 December per the cited source.)--Launchballer 14:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Bowden[edit]

  • Source: [3] & [4] & [5] (the last two verify that Bowden is in the NFL and that Sanborn is in the NFL)
Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 181 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Let me know if the hook is understandable or if it needs to be reworded. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Waiting on QPQ. The hook makes sense to me. Article was created on 9 May and is long enough. No copyright or sourcing issues. Hook is reasonably interesting and sourced. Riley1012 (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ reminder BeanieFan11. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, will do later today. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Riley1012: QPQ done. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BeanieFan11: Okay thanks, good to go now. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Odumegwu[edit]

Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 180 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • article is long enough, new enough and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting (note, linked NFL in the hook). Awaiting QPQ BeanieFan11. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The hook is a bit confusing. What does "organized football game" mean? If you get the context, yes it's interesting, but without the context it may be confusing. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I find it understandable, but would saying something like, e.g., his first "formal" game, be better? BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that helps. If the point is that the first he placed an actual game of American football while in the NFL and never played the game before, that could probably be made clearer. Adding that he actually started out as a basketball player might also add interest. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As an aside, it's almost a week since the nomination so a QPQ will need to be given sooner rather than later. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will do tomorrow. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Throwing out some possible ALTs, re-wording is welcome:
There might be a better way to word ALT2 to address my concerns about what "organized" means, these suggestions are more for brainstorming purposes. Pinging Gonzo_fan2007 for his thoughts. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am fine with Alt2 if Beanie is. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meh, I don't think that's as interesting a hook, not to mention I'm not sure I see how that would alleviate the "organized" concern? Though, if we're going with that style, what about: ALT3 ... that prior to playing in the NFL, Kenneth Odumegwu had never appeared in an organized American football game? BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • to ALT3. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jude McAtamney[edit]

Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 182 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new enough, long enough, and within policy. No copyright detected. Hook length and fact are verified to the cited references. The hook is interesting. Good work.4meter4 (talk) 04:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sikidy[edit]

A Malagasy diviner performs sikidy in 1900
A Malagasy diviner performs sikidy in 1900
Created by Zanahary (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Zanahary (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article new enough and long enough. Passes earwig, no close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is quite interesting, cited inline, and verified. Image appropriately licensed. I'd suggest linking "people" in the hook to Malagasy peoples, but otherwise GTG.Pseud 14 (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article has a {{clump}} tag; this should be resolved before this runs.--Launchballer 09:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zanahary and Pseud 14: Fixed ping.--Launchballer 09:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: done! Zanahary (talk) 17:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Better, although I've just noticed that much of the "Algorithmically-generated columns" lacks of end-of-paragraph citations, is this covered by another policy?--Launchballer 14:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’ll fix that—I think it’s a relic from when that content was a single paragraph. It all comes from just one source. Zanahary (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. I don't plan on promoting this while there are five hooks in the bottom set, but this is ready.--Launchballer 16:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide of Fat Cat[edit]

The Shibanpo Yangtze River Bridge where Fat Cat jumped off.
The Shibanpo Yangtze River Bridge where Fat Cat jumped off.
  • ... that following the suicide of Fat Cat (location pictured), McDonald's Vietnam was the target of a boycott after launching a slogan: "If you don't like vegetables, eat chicken with BBQ cheese? Source: Hoang, Vu (7 May 2024). "McDonald's Vietnam apologizes for slogan mocking tragic death of Chinese man". VnExpress International. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
    • Reviewed:
Created by TheGreatPeng (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

TheGreatPeng (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Comment: I would suggest having some alternatives. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 15:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this article, although not quite enough to violate my policy of doing my QPQs oldest first. I will say that this article is being edited a lot and is probably not stable. For now, I recommend ALT0a: ... that McDonald's Vietnam was boycotted after appropriating a slogan by a recently deceased Chinese gamer?--Launchballer 15:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • ALT1: ... that a Chinese gamer named Fat Cat tragically died by suicide after transferring a large sum of money to his girlfriend, who wished to end their relationship? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGreatPeng (talkcontribs)
I'd lose 'tragically' for concision, but I'll let a reviewer make that choice. Full review needed.--Launchballer 18:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hooks must not contain redirects or contractions, although to be fair that's probably not far off the hook I would have suggested. For concision, I suggest ALT2a: ... that when people ordered fast food take-out to commemorate Fat Cat's suicide, multiple restaurants delivered empty packages?--Launchballer 08:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend ALT0a with image. TheGreatPeng (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, well sourced, and BDP-compliant; AGF on its verifiability against the Chinese sources as well as the accuracy of its translation, although I did make some copy edits here and there. Nominator is exempted from doing a QPQ, this being their third nomination in a total of four. Passing ALT0a for its concision and potential to entice audiences into reading the article. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nineteen Ninety-Four guy, you don't mention the image in your review. Is it appropriate and adequately visible to be run with any of the hooks? Given that ALT0a doesn't mention Fat Cat by name, or his means of death, the image caption doesn't really go with the hook. (I just looked, and the image here is not currently in the article, having been swapped out for another one on 20 May, which makes it ineligible for DYK usage. I'll let you decide whether the new image is useful and should be included here instead as part of your updated review—I can't tell whether they're even pictures of the same bridge!) BlueMoonset (talk) 04:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • @BlueMoonset: I apologize about that, and thanks for striking through the rejected hooks. As a follow-up, the images on both this entry and the boldlinked article are freely-licensed, albeit swapped out; but neither one is used in the approved hook, thus hook image is clearly not going to end up in the main page. That being said, the alt hook is interesting enough that it can manage without either image caption; I just hope the DYK prepper places it at the bottom of the queue or nearby it at least. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting here that there is a move request in progress. WP:DYKTAG does not mention requested moves but this is something for promoters to be aware of.--Launchballer 10:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tobias and the Angel[edit]

example by Titian
example by Titian
  • ... that, unusually for a religious subject, depictions of Tobias and the Angel usually show his dog?
  • Source: Hall, James, Hall's Dictionary of Subjects and Symbols in Art, 1996 (2nd edn.), John Murray, ISBN 0719541476, page 304
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 240 past nominations.

Johnbod (talk) 01:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

ALT1: ... that depictions of Tobias and the Angel usually show his dog?
really says everything that has to be said, in less space. RoySmith (talk) 13:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it is unusual-and it is very unusual-is the hooky bit. It's a short hook anyway. Johnbod (talk) 14:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The point of a hook is to be short and sweet, and leave just a little mystery, enticing the reader to click through to the article. There's no need to tell people this is a religious subject, that's obvious from the title of the painting. And there's no need to tell them it's unusual, the fact that there's a dog speaks for that itself. RoySmith (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dubious - gaming/superhero culture is chock full of angels with no religious context at all, & I'm sure vast numbers of our readers have no opinion at all on the frequency with which dogs appear in Christian religious art. Johnbod (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 5× expansion of 6 May 2024‎ version completed from 898 characters to 4,527 and nominated eight days later (calculating from this version as opposed to the 2 May version makes this just one day late, so I'm willing to invoke WP:IAR). No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Main hook is 97 characters long (ALT1 is 61); both are under 200 character max. and are interesting. AGF book for ref 7 (verifying the hook) which is offline. QPQ done. Image is free and in the public domain. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bjarne Store-Jakobsen[edit]

Created by Ornithoptera (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 31 past nominations.

Ornithoptera (talk) 19:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - The second source does not appear to be accessible to me; although the full quote is included here I am unable to verify this.
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting article, passes newness, length, copyvio and sourcing policies. QPQ done. I'm unable to verify the quote using the second source provided, so a replacement will be needed before I can pass this. Would also like to see another round of copy-editing on the article to clean up a few errors. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 09:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Sims2aholic8: Hi! Nice to meet you! Just completed copyediting as per your request. The link for the article for some reason doesn't allow for external access which is really weird, as you have mentioned. Here is a HTML link through Google Scholar that I used, but if this doesn't work, search for the title on the site and it should be the first result. Ornithoptera (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for providing that! I'm now able to verify the hook using the new reference provided, and the copy-edit looks good, so happy to pass this now! Sims2aholic8 (talk) 08:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're very much welcome! Thank you so much for taking the time to go through this article! Cheers and have a wonderful day @Sims2aholic8:! Ornithoptera (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Xenophon of Robeika[edit]

  • Source: Ankudinov, I. Yu. (2016). Ксенофонтов Робейский Николаевский монастырь [Xenophon Robeysky Nikolaevsky Monastery]. Novgorod Archive Bulletin. Vol. 13. Veliky Novgorod. pp. 83–84.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
5x expanded by Evrik (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 116 past nominations.

--evrik (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Wow, I love this hook. Article is long enough and 5x expanded as of today, Earwig finds no copyvio, sourcing looks good and I'm AGFing on the languages I can't read (DeepL translation shows me it lines up). Hook is cited, again AGF because I can't be certain, given that I can't read Russian, and your QPQ is good. Zanahary (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: This saint's day is June 28. Would you mind dropping this in the SOHA for that day? --evrik (talk) 18:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Evrik and Zanahary: please could you double check the source for the hook? I found it online via Academia.edu here. My reading is that Ankudinov thinks that there was only oral tradition before the 18th-century vita. After discussing two 17th century documents, the sentence on pages 86 and 87 says "Возможно, это свидетельствует о том, что к этому времени текст Жития Ксенофонта еще не сложился, и среди населения бытовали лишь устные предания о преподобном. [Perhaps this indicates that by this time the text of the Life of Xenophon had not yet been formed, and only oral traditions about the saint existed among the population. via Google translate]". TSventon (talk) 16:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is accurate, I am not sure it is surprising. I think the article needs some work, hopefully Чръный человек can help. TSventon (talk) 16:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ola Labib[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 228 past nominations.

Launchballer 18:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: New enough, long enough. Earwig detects 51.6% match due to a cited passage in the article so that is not a problem. Quotes that result in a match are cited. The hooks are cited and are interesting. Preference for ALT0 and ALT2. QPQ has been completed! Great work, cheers! Ornithoptera (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yangliujie Catholic Church[edit]

The façade of the church
The façade of the church
  • Source: See Huang, Xian (2021-01-30). 遵义会议会址确认记 [Confirmation of the Site of the Zunyi Conference]. People's Daily Overseas Edition 人民日报海外版 (in Chinese). or Pan, Kaimao (2012). 遵义会议期间红军总政治部旧址简介 [Site of the Political Directorate of the Chinese Red Army during the Zunyi Conference]. Zhongguo Diming 中国地名. No. 05. p. 13..
Created by TheLonelyPather (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 22 past nominations.

Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 11:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough, long enough, presentable, well-sourced, no copyvio, hook cited and QPQ done. Uriel1022 (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley Warde[edit]

  • ... that actress Shirley Warde first began starring in play productions at the age of six?
Created by Silver seren (talk) and FloridaArmy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 118 past nominations.

SilverserenC 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Looks good to me, long enough, new enough, good sourcing and well written. I think ALT1 is more interesting as a hook. Luiysia (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simon de Graaff[edit]

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 662 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Date, length, hook, qpq, earwig close paraphrase check works out. I prefer the main hook over ALT1. --Soman (talk) 11:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]