User talk:Gabriel601

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your draft article, Draft:Filmymantra Media[edit]

Hello, Gabriel601. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filmymantra Media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mlj Marine Oil & Gas[edit]

Hello, Gabriel601. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mlj Marine Oil & Gas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ulugbekhon Maksumov[edit]

Information icon Hello, Gabriel601. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ulugbekhon Maksumov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly look into my Unblock request.[edit]

Good day @Cabayi, @CaptainEek, @Enterprisey, @GeneralNotability, @Guerillero, @Izno, @Moneytrees, @Primefac, @SilkTork, @Worm That Turned, @Dreamy Jazz, @Liz. I’m so sorry to ping you on this case but have been off for over 6 month as directed and I have said what really happened on my previous unblock request which has been pending for months and I also promised it’s never gonna repeat it’s self please kindly look into my request. Thanks & have a lovely day ahead. Gabriel (talk to me ) 16:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom has already reviewed your case and sent you an email on/about May 11, 2023, declining your appeal. Continued attempts to request review from ArbCom members will likely result in your talk page privileges being removed. Izno (talk) 16:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I gave no reason on the mail. The reply was a declining due to there was no reason. I thought my unblock request is where it’s gonna be look into because that was where I stated my reasons. --Gabriel (talk to me ) 17:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The committee received an appeal from you on 30 Oct 2022. The committee consulted with the blocking admin, looked at the evidence, and declined your appeal three days later on 2 Nov 2022, with a note that you could apply again 6 months from the date of that email. You appealed again on 8 Apr 2023, which was one month too early, and received an email the same day informing you of this. You appealed again on the 9th May. The committee considered your explanation above: #Unblock_request, took into account the January sockpuppet investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gabriel601/Archive#28_January_2023, and declined your appeal two days later on 11 May with a note that you can apply six months from the date of the email. This is not six months from the date of the email.
This is the second time you have been impatient. You have unnecessarily and inappropriately pinged 12 volunteers. I would have removed your talkpage privilege, however I note above that Izno has been kinder and given you a warning. Heed that warning and do not contact anyone about your appeal until 11 Nov 2023 at the earliest. There is no need for you to respond to this message. What is required from you now is simply that you do not attempt to edit Wikipedia through another account, and that you consider your situation carefully. We are aware that you have been using multiple accounts. If you wish an appeal in future to be successful, you need to be completely honest with us about using other accounts. If you continue to deny it, you are not going to be allowed back in because we would be unable to trust you. Be aware that even if you do admit to using sockpuppets, that is no guarantee we will unblock you; however, it will be more likely. SilkTork (talk) 10:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request (2024)[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Gabriel601 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been off from Wikipedia after my last statement on my talk page which was made (22nd May 2023) and after reading a statement where SilkTork said there was no need responding. So I had to take a leave which has made me understand and realise I was at the wrong side about the Wikipedia policy. With the few months, which has been over 8 months if am not mistaken, I can boldly say am totally different from past attitude. I could have come back immediately after the six month time given but I wasn't in a hurry anymore because I feel different. I actually had in mind one day I will be back here to apologise for all my wrong deeds about Sockpuppet and promise never will that happen again after my love for wikipedia as a contributor and the knowledge it has impact in my life. Each time I get to read about articles here on wikipedia it reminds me about my block account. I do always feel eager to make good contributions to the platform and also happy that I was able to create, write and took pictures about some popular places such as Iyana-Iba, Lagos State, Choba, Port Harcourt and so on. It feels lonely to be recognise as an editor who never came back to apologise for its wrongs. I hope i can be forgiven as I promise never to indulge myself into Sockpuppet anymore. And promise to make wikipedia a better place to the society, thanks. Gabriel (talk to me ) 10:29 pm, 27 March 2024, Wednesday (2 months, 6 days ago) (UTC+0)

Accept reason:

Gabriel601 appears to understand what they did wrong, and has committed not to engage in sockpuppeting, nor to write articles for pay, and to avoid any conflicts of interest. Unblocked. SilkTork (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on CU data, there's no evidence of recent block evasion that I can see. --Yamla (talk) 09:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked (23 October 2022) BlockList/Gabriel601.--Gabriel (talk to me ) 14:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greeting @SilkTork, am actually confused right now as I don't know what else to do regarding the response @Yamla gave me that my block evasion can't be found. I was blocked by @Dreamy Jazz years ago. Gabriel (talk to me ) 13:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yamla's only confirming that they found no evidence of block evasion over the last eight months. Checking that is a typical step in evaluating an unblock request for a sockpuppeting sanction. Many people who say they made no edits during their block are discovered to have actually edited while logged out or using another account. That Yamla did not find evidence of recent block evasion is a point in your favor. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @CoffeeCrumbs. I really do appreciate your explanation. Gabriel (talk to me ) 08:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an administrator, just an uninvolved editor with a longstanding interest in the gnome-y governance/administrative side of Wikipedia. But I'm really rooting for you to be unblocked here; it appears you took the WP:STANDARD to heart and I like seeing editors get second chances. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @CoffeeCrumbs. Gabriel (talk to me ) 15:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is good that you have acknowledged that you created sockpuppet accounts. And it is good that you have refrained from creating new sock puppets, and that you commit to not creating any more in future. This goes in your favour. One thing that you would need to clear up is any concerns that people may have about you editing for payment without telling us. We do allow people to edit for payment - but they must declare that they are being paid. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. SilkTork (talk) 03:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @SilkTork. I really do appreciate your response. Regarding being paid to create articles. I have never in my life had the thought of taking money from people to create articles neither writing about someone closer to me but I have a little story to share about the draft article Draft:Filmymantra Media. It's a Bollywood media company of which the founder was my friend so he approached me one day and told me he would like me to create a wikipedia page for his company which falls under the wikipedia guidelines of Conflict of interest. I never took money to write because it's not a thing I do for a living to earn but a thing I do as fun writing and to improve myself on knowledge. I also never had in mind of coming back to the draft article Draft:Filmymantra Media as it goes against wikipedia guidelines. I pledge to be honest now and forever that is why I have to talk about it. Gabriel (talk to me ) 09:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to unblock. User:Dreamy Jazz, do you have any objections, or anything to add? SilkTork (talk) 13:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing from me. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. SilkTork (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @SilkTork for the acceptance and I promise your action towards my unblock request won't be a regrettable one. I know this could be a little bit of task but I had some draft article over the years i left them due to my block and they were over six months so they got deleted as per deletion of old drafts. Draft:Iyanna Mayweather, Genesis (restaurant), Draft:Speed Darlington, Draft:Ulugbekhon Maksumov, Draft:SportyBet, Draft:Ozuoba. It won't be easy, rewriting. Although if I was to rewrite I would rather give up on them because it's not easy to come up with grammars that has been written before except I never started them. Gabriel (talk to me ) 16:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For requests to restore drafts that were deleted because they were stale, see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13. If a draft was deleted because of other concerns, such as paid editing, best raise the issue with the admin who deleted it. SilkTork (talk) 11:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Gabriel (talk to me ) 14:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Dreamy Jazz. Gabriel (talk to me ) 15:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Portable (musician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Portable (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portable (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 23:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]