User talk:Philafrenzy
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Philafrenzy. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal[edit]
|
The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
| For your work in getting 50 articles through the DYK process. --evrik (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you. I look forward to the medal for the other 650. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tremendous work! No Swan So Fine (talk) 22:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, the first 50 are the hardest. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tremendous work! No Swan So Fine (talk) 22:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
The other 650 DYKs[edit]
|
The DYK Barnstar | |
| Here is a much-deserved medal for the other 650 DYKs. Edwardx (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
- And from me too Whispyhistory (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both, I couldn't have done it without you! Philafrenzy (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Always precious[edit]
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael McLintock for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael McLintock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Kingsmasher678 (talk) 04:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
The article Minerva in the emblems of educational establishments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Largely unsourced, no evidence of notability per WP:LISTN
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
The article Tahar Allan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lacking notability - unable to find any relevant sourcing beyond one listed here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marleeashton (talk) 00:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)