Talk:Earthshot Prize
Earthshot Prize is currently a Royalty, nobility and heraldry good article nominee. Nominated by MSincccc (talk) at 18:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Environmental initiative award |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Earthshot Prize/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 18:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Tim O'Doherty (talk · contribs) 14:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Lead
- "'waste-free living', and 'climate action'" - don't need the Oxford comm
- Done
- Introduce Attenborough
- Done
- "Prince William and Attenborough" - drop Prince
- Done
Background and launch
- What's the rationale behind the massive quote at the start?
- Could you please elaborate further? Should it be rephrased or removed?
- "crucial decades for the environment [..] We must have some hope" - MOS:..., should be "crucial decades for the environment. ... We must have some hope"
- Done
- "to be given to five individuals or organisations who provided impactful and sustainable solutions for the planet's environmental problems between 2021 and 2030" - open to misinterpretation: five people/organisations over the 10 year span, or each year for ten years? Finding solutions for the planet's problems between 2021 and 2030, finding solutions for the problems that existed between 2021 and 2030, or the prize to be awarded between 2021 and 2030? Needs a rework.
- "cited the work of his grandfather Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, father King Charles III" - why is it "Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh" but not "Prince William, Duke of Cambridge"? Charles isn't king by this point. "father" -> "his father".
- Done
- Inconsistent between "the prize" and "the Prize".
- "former US President John F. Kennedy" -> "the former American president John F. Kennedy"
- Done
- "launched the project in October 2020, with a prize budget of £50 million" - not separate points: "in October 2020 with a prize budget of £50 million"
- Done
- "To commemorate the launch, William" - ditto, the comma shouldn't be here
- Done
- "Prince William and Attenborough both appeared" - repetition, "the pair" or similar is fine
- Done
- "detailed the importance of environmental work" -> quite a fuzzy and vague phrase: a bit of detail would be nice
- "In July 2022, it was announced" - drop comma
- I would have dropped it had only the year been mentioned. When the month has been mentioned, we don't drop it. I have checked with the other articles.
- "The Royal Foundation" - T -> t
- Done
- "the Earthshot Prize had become" - don't need the full name again: it's like writing "Paul McCartney" or "Eric Cantona" at every instance in their biography in place of "McCartney" or "Cantona". Just "the prize" or "the organisation" is fine.
- Done
- "Zoë Ware, and Jean-Christophe Gray" - comma again
- Done
- "Jacinda Ardern later joined the board" - introduce her: "the former prime minister of New Zealand" or similar
- Done
- "later joined" - an idea of time would be useful: "joined the year later" etc
- Done
- What has the last paragraph got to do with the launch? Should be moved or merged into the next section: "Management and funding"?
- Done
Funding
- "Conservation International, and the Bezos Earth Fund" - ditto
- Done
- "In an interview about the Earthshot Prize broadcast on 14 October 2021, William told the BBC's Newscast about the rise in "climate anxiety" among younger generations, and suggested that rich entrepreneurs should be "trying to repair this planet, not trying to find the next place to go and live"." - what has this got to do with funding?
- Done Removed it. William's statement, although relevant to the overall context of environmental concerns and the ethos behind the Earthshot Prize, does not pertain to its funding mechanisms. It could be more appropriately placed in another section. What do you suggest?
Categories and nomination process
- "In September 2023, ahead of the second Earthshot Prize Innovation Summit in New York City, animal rights and climate activist, Genesis Butler, partnered with Generation Vegan to request the Prince of Wales to add an "Advance a Plant-Based Food System" category, matching the sum that the other five category winners receive.[24]" - did anything come of this? If not, why is it relevant?
More to come. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Tim O'Doherty Thanks for taking the article up for GAR. I would be addressing your comments soon. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- C-Class awards articles
- Low-importance awards articles
- Awards articles
- C-Class British royalty articles
- Low-importance British royalty articles
- WikiProject British Royalty articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles