Talk:Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)
Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song) is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by Santi (talk) at 22:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.
|
Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song) (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 12 March 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 22:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
I will crack on with this one right away! --K. Peake 07:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Infobox and lead[edit]
- WP:OVERLINK of Fred under songwriters and ATL Jacob under producers
- "on December 1, 2023 through" → "on December 1, 2023, through" plus this should be the sentence directly before the composition instead
- "but later sent the track to" → "until later being sent to"
- "It is the second song on which Villada collaborates with an American hip hop producer after "Le Pido a Dios" with DJ Premier, so it was" → "The second song on which Villada collaborates with an American hip hop producer after "Le Pido a Dios" with DJ Premier, it was" and make this the sentence directly after the writers/producers
- I think it is worth noting how many countries it further reached the top 10 in and the certifications, in a separate sentence
- "An accompanying music video, directed by Sebastián Sánchez and released on March 6, 2024" → "An accompanying music video, directed by Sebastián Sánchez and released on March 6, 2024," with the wikilink
- I think the synopsis summary here can be cut off after him going back in time
Background and critical reception[edit]
- Are you sure this shouldn't be titled Background and composition?
- The opening sentence reads weirdly and should say in the order that he released his first EP Sixdo as a surprise release through Universal Music Latino
- Remove overly obvious wikilink on studio album
- "he announced on" → "Villada announced on"
- "surprise release and sharing that" → "surprise release and sharing,"
- Audio sample looks good!
- "through the window."" → "through the window"." per MOS:QUOTE
- "It was" → "The song was"
- Remove wikilink on Italy
- "go with another person."" → "go with another person"."
- "to the global level."" → "to the global level"." and add "The staff of" before the publication
Commercial performance[edit]
- Img looks good!
- Swap this with music video for the correct order
- "received a 3x Platinum" → "received a triple platinum" and mention how many units signified by this in the country
- "despite a decrease of 8%" → "despite a decrease of 6%" per the source
- Write quadruple platinum instead and mention this was in the US
- "outside the United States compared" → "outside the US compared" per MOS:US
- "the song climbed three spots to" → "the song had climbed to" since this is two weeks, not one
- Mention both the artists it was the first top five for
Music video[edit]
- Merge with the below section and retitle to Music video and promotion
- "this song so far, we made" → "this song so far. We made" per the source
- InfoBae should not be italicized
- "resonance among viewers."" → "resonance among viewers"." per MOS:QUOTE
- "shoot her partner starring Villada" what does this mean?
Live performances and covers[edit]
- Make this the second para of the above section
- Pipe acoustic to Acoustic music
- Pipe Lollapalooza Argentina to Lollapalooza
Accolades[edit]
- Per the Best Urban Song being written out in the lead, you need to add a mention of it in prose here – I would suggest a para summarizing these awards
- Refs should be centered
Credits and personnel[edit]
- Use
{{spaced ndash}}
so there is the right space between credits and personnel
Charts[edit]
Weekly charts[edit]
- Pipe FONOTICA to Asociación Costarricense de la Industria Fonográfica y Afines
Monthly charts[edit]
- Good
Certifications[edit]
- Good
Release history[edit]
- Good
References[edit]
- Copyvio score looks great at 27.0%!!!
- Regarding MOS:CAPS issues, only remove capitalization on any refs where it is not part of the stylization of the artist or musical work name
- Cite Los 40 as publisher instead on refs 1 and 44
- Add Rolling Stone on ref 3 with the wikilink
- Pipe Vogue México to Vogue México y Latinoamérica on ref 4
- Cite Radio Programas del Perú as publisher instead on ref 5
- Wikilink El Colombiano on ref 8
- Pipe Universal Music Latino to Universal Music Latin Entertainment on ref 12
- Pipe Rolling Stone en Español to Rolling Stone on ref 13
- Pipe FONOTICA to Asociación Costarricense de la Industria Fonográfica y Afines on ref 18
- Cite Infobae as publisher instead on refs 37 and 40
- Wikilink YouTube on ref 39
- Cite AStv Colombia as publisher instead on ref 41
Final comments and verdict[edit]
- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; I'll be able to get back on it even if you are done later today! --K. Peake 08:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees currently on hold
- Good article nominees on review
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class song articles
- B-Class Colombia articles
- Low-importance Colombia articles
- WikiProject Colombia articles
- B-Class Latin music articles
- Low-importance Latin music articles
- Latin music articles