This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Seriously, this article contradicts itself every paragraph, and it looks more like a talk page than anything. Wow. Steel1943 (talk) 02:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely, I agree. Moreover, it draws a number of conclusions based on false premises. It is essentially worthless. — QuicksilverT@ 14:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Editors should make their articles as easy to find as possible, particularly for other editors. I have several times worked on a biography article, only to find (when creating a redirect ?!) that another, usually better, article already exists. For that reason alone, a redirect should be created for any way that name is written in readily available references. I exempt spelling errors, where a redirect can increase confusion, but if common should be noted in the lede. Doug butler (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]