Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions (alt)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

This list is also available in a discussion-link-first format and in table format. 76 discussions have been relisted.

June 4, 2024[edit]

  • Coke Studio (Pakistani TV program) → Coke Studio Pakistan – (Discuss) – The new title aligns with all of the other articles as well as the other text. If this is not the name of the series as used in secondary sources, then all of the other pages should be renamed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2028 Tasmanian state election → Template:Next Tasmanian state election – (Discuss) – This page should be moved to the above as is convention on wikipedia for future eletions that have not been formally announced. The info on this page should remain, but it should be moved to the above. I reference the Next Australian federal election, where we are approaching it and lots of detail and candidates are already available, however it still remains at "Next" in the title. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 04:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • William Adams (pilot) → William Adams (samurai) – (Discuss) – Detailed exposition in the thread just above, but his WP:COMMONNAME appears to mostly have the term "samurai" attached to it.

    He was not most notable as a pilot (meaning ship's navigator). He did a fair amount in his early years, and his common name in Japan was "'the pilot of Miura [Peninsula]"; but what he really is notable is, he was the first Englishman in Japan, and stayed there and became an important advisor to the shogun and introduced several modernizations.

    He was made a samurai -- maybe, or maybe not, but apparently that is how he known in the Anglosphere: books about him are like Samurai William and A True and Complete Account of the Life of William Adams - The English Samurai and Samurai William: The Englishman Who Opened Japan and William Adams, Samurai and Anjin - The Life and Times of Samurai William Adams, 1564-1620: A Japanese Perspective and Anjin (William Adams): The English Samurai and Servant of the Shogun: Being the True Story of William Adams, Pilot and Samurai, the First Englishman in Japan and The Blue-Eyed Samurai -- William Adams and Anjin: The Shogun and the English Samurai and probably more. But there is a book titled Adams the Pilot and Brittanica's article is "William Adams, English Navigator"

    It's been claimed by an editor(s) that he was not actually a samurai, but rather just a hatamoto which is an upper vassal to a samurai lord. Maybe that is so, or maybe it is debatable, and we don't want to tell the reader things that we are not quite sure are true. OTOH the article itself says "in 1605 Tokugawa further granted Adams the status of samurai." Herostratus (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hilltop Horizon → Hilltop Mall – (Discuss) – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Sources overwhelmingly refer to the mall as "Hilltop Mall", which is also the name used on local signs. I tried searching online for "Hilltop Horizon", and I only found sources that discuss the Hilltop Horizon Specific Plan but still call the mall itself "Hilltop Mall": [1][2][3] —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 22:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Il Mare Calmo della Sera → Il mare calmo della sera – (Discuss) – Italian-language style per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization)#Works and compositions, in line with Il mare calmo della sera (song). I had opened a technical request which was contested by User:Amakuru, who also reverted a subsequent move perfomed by User:Liz. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 3, 2024[edit]

June 2, 2024[edit]

References

  1. ^ Wintle, Bonnie C.; Fraser, Hannah; Wills, Ben C.; Nicholson, Ann E.; Fidler, Fiona (2019-04-17). "Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than numbers". PLOS ONE. 14 (4): e0213522. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1413522W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213522. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6469752. PMID 30995242.
  2. ^ van Tiel, Bob; Sauerland, Uli; Franke, Michael; Nicholson, Ann E.; Fidler, Fiona (2022). "Meaning and Use in the Expression of Estimative Probability". Open Mind. 6 (4): 250–263. doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00066. ISSN 2470-2986. PMC 9987346. PMID 36891036.
Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Iṣṭa-devatā (Hinduism) → Ishtadevata – (Discuss) – As WP:ONEOTHER, the Sanskrit term Ishtadevata (IAST: Iṣṭa-devatā) is primarily used in Hinduism vis-a-vis Buddhism where Yidam (from Tibetan) is the popular term (ishtadevata is a ceremonial Sanskrit term). The following generic religion encyclopedias define the term in the Hindu context * An_Introductory_Dictionary_of_Theology p. 651 [15] * Encyclopedia of Love in World Religions:Page 301 - Yudit Kornberg Greenberg · 2007 * Encyclopedia of Spirits and Ghosts in World Mythology - Page 44 (under Devata entry) Theresa Bane · 2016 * The Encyclopedia of Yoga and Tantra - Page 352 Georg Feuerstein · 2022 Encyclopedia of Hinduism - Page 203 - Constance Jones, James D. Ryan · 2006: "Ishta devata (desired divinity) is an important concept in theistic Hinduism." - illustrates its importance in Hinduism Redtigerxyz Talk 14:23, 25 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Proton (technology company) → Proton AG – (Discuss) – Full company name. Simpler and more concise (WP:CONCISE). Allowed per WP:NCCORP. Strugglehouse (talk) 15:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ToadetteEdit! 14:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 1, 2024[edit]

References

  1. ^ Knuth, Donald (1997). Fundamental algorithms. The Art of Computer Programming. Vol. 1 (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN 978-0-201-89683-1.
  2. ^ Alexandrescu, Andrei (2010). The D Programming Language. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN 0-321-63536-1. Bentley, Jon (2000). Programming pearls (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-65788-3.
  3. ^ Knuth, Donald (1998). Sorting and searching. The Art of Computer Programming. Vol. 3 (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN 978-0-201-89685-5.
IntGrah (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 31, 2024[edit]

May 30, 2024[edit]

May 29, 2024[edit]

  • 1918 Irish general election → 1918 United Kingdom general election in Ireland – (Discuss) – This article is about the portion of the 1918 UK general election which was held in Ireland, similar to December 1910 United Kingdom general election in Ireland. It was not an election to the Dáil Éireann like 1922 Irish general election, as the Dáil Éireann did not exist at the time of the election, but was formed in the aftermath of the election. So the current article title is incorrect. Chessrat (talk, contributions) 23:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tibet → Greater Tibet – (Discuss) – Tibet commonly means Tibet Autonomous Region, more info and common links can be found in Talk page of Tibet, also Talk page of Tibet Autonomous Region, current Tibet page can be moved to Greater Tibet Toto11zi (talk) 14:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • NoBull → NOBULL – (Discuss) – The official company name is NOBULL, not NoBull, and is always stylized NOBULL Jcostas81 (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Jcostas81 (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Love Stories → Love Stories (film) – (Discuss) – Not particularly notable, averages single-digit daily pageviews. See dabpage at Love Story. 162 etc. (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anti-Normanism → Normanism – (Discuss) – The article starts with "Anti-Normanism is an opposition to Normanism, the mainstream narrative..." I find it weird that the mainstream theory of Normanism is but a section inside the fringe theory. The article must be moved and reshuffled upside down. - Altenmann >talk 19:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wanna Be (GloRilla and Megan Thee Stallion song) → Wanna Be – (Discuss) – Per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Wanna Be currently redirects to Wannabe (disambiguation). These topics are all titled "Wannabe", with two exceptions: this song, and Wanna Be (single album), which receives essentially no traffic.[29] Wannabe is not known in any reliable sources as "Wanna Be." The two-word spelling is sufficient disambiguation; move song to primary topic, with hatnotes to the single album and dabpage. 162 etc. (talk) 21:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hoani Nahi → Hoani Nahe – (Discuss) – While 'Nahi' appears in some sources, and sometimes both 'Nahe' and 'Nahi' appear in the same source, it seems that 'Nahe' is the correct spelling. 'Nahe' is the only spelling used in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography article, the Cyclopedia of New Zealand article, and the numerous articles about him in the Journal of the Polynesian Society. In Papers Past magazines and journals, 'Hoani Nahe' occurs 78 times and 'Hoani Nahi' never. In Papers Past newspapers 'Hoani Nahe' occurs 696 times and 'Hoani Nahi' 47 times. All 47 times were articles about him, not by him; the letters that he wrote to newspapers were always singed 'Nahe'. We did once had an article called Hoani Nahe – it was merged into this one, rather than the reverse merge, for reasons I don't understand. Nurg (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Invertebrate iridescent virus 31 → Iridovirus armadillidium1 – (Discuss) – Renamed by ICTV in 2023. https://ictv.global/taxonomy/taxondetails?taxnode_id=202306334&taxon_name=Iridovirus%20armadillidium1 Grey Clownfish (talk) 09:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sloboda → Sloboda (settlement) – (Discuss) – This word means "freedom" in the original Slavic languages, and while there is a significant usage in Russian and Ukrainian history as well as some usage in modern-day Russian administrative divisions, described at this presumed primary topic, its usage and long-term significance does not actually overshadow the ambiguity over the other uses of the word for the average English reader. In preparation for this move, I went through the list of ~200 incoming links to preemptively disambiguate them. The usage is typically clerical, to explain the strange term, which is most commonly placed in italics. This indicates that the fact that the explanation was directly at "sloboda" was a very easy way to get the etymological explanation. However, that's a possible description of editor behavior, which is not necessarily the reader behavior (WP:RF). It should also be noted that Russian toponymy lists are quite weird from the perspective of a navigation purpose for set indices, with an apparent habit of linking these kinds of terms contrary to what MOS:DABONE would advise. It's not that I'm opposed to having a link somewhere in such a set index to explain the term, but the volume of this skews the statistics. After going through the list, I was left with 19 links (~10%) where I couldn't identify a clear connection to this particular subject. Mostly they seemed to be generic references to the Slavic word for "freedom". This also extended to Russian topics. Some were references to specific places named Sloboda, not the concept. I had also disambiguated numerous others by linking Foobar Svoboda instead of keeping a largely useless partial link (sadly I didn't keep a count of these to be able to note the percentage). A search in Google Books for me does not identify this meaning to be primary - I get more references to people named this way. Likewise for Google Scholar. I don't have reason to believe that this would differ for the average English reader. WikiNav for Sloboda and meta:Research:Wikipedia clickstream archive indicate that the hatnote is consistently one of the most commonly clicked links on the page - even in months where we see a larger readership, it's still among the most commonly clicked links (for example in March '24, with 162 clickstreams to 9 identified destinations, the hatnote was #3 with 17). This is typically indicative of a navigation issue. Another editor reverted the initial preparatory move, thinking this broke links (it did not) and saying this changes a 'long established' status quo - I don't see an actual rationale there. Just because this grew organically as is - doesn't mean it's not subject to evaluation and adjustment. In addition, similar terms like svoboda and swoboda are not short-circuiting here and are indeed disambiguated, so this change would seem to make things more consistent. Joy (talk) 23:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • WOH S264 → W60 B90 – (Discuss) – [W60] B90 is a name that has been used way more in literature than WOH S264. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 07:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Genocide of Indigenous peoples → Genocide of indigenous peoples – (Discuss) – "Indigenous" is only a proper name when adopted as conventional for a particular ethnic group, and when applied to the specific groups who have done so. As a general, global adjective it is not and cannot be a proper name (any more than the opposite, "colonial"), so should not be capitalized. See in particular the lead paragraph of MOS:CAPS: WP does not capitalize that which is not capitalized consistently across nearly all independent reliable sources, and "indigenous peoples" is not so capitalized (indeed, it is overwhelmingly lowercase [30][31], except in highly retrictive contexts that refer to specific populations who have adopted the term self-referentially as a name in English). This same situation is true of all such terms such as "native" and "aboriginal". "Aboriginal" is capitalized in reference to autochthonous Australians, and "Native" is capitalized in "Native Americans" in reference to the autochthonous peoples of what is now the US and sometimes (in mostly US usage) all of the Americas. But "native" is not capitalized (by the preponderance of modern reliable sources) in reference to Australians, nor "aboriginal" in reference to Americans, and neither is capitalized in "the native (aboriginal) peoples and languages of Siberia and Central Asia before the Soviet Union", etc. PS: There may be other over-capitalized articles of this sort, but perhaps take them one at a time, since some might pertain more narrowly to groups that have taken on "Indigenous" as a self-referential name/label.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  04:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC); revised 06:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Karma (2024 song) → Karma's a Bitch – (Discuss) – This page keeps getting moved. The previous rationale was "The song was originally called that in the Miley Cyrus demo, and the Brit Smith demo. It also takes away the disambiguating, so it more succinct." I’m unsure, however. The article is about the song as an entity, but that 'entity' hasn’t got a name, but it’s clear that there are two versions of the same song, and that they are not covers of each other. I don’t think this has ever happened before. Plus the proposed title is already a redirect to the page, so seems like the most logical title. This is a case of 'what came first, the chicken or the egg?' Another suggestion is Karma and Karma's a Bitch. 109.235.247.80 (talk) 01:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • September 2022 Armenia–Azerbaijan clashes → 2022 аttack of Azerbaijan on Armenia – (Discuss) – I have not seen a single reliable source saying that Armenia attacked Azerbaijan. But multiple reliable sources say the opposite. Various sources describe the events as an “invasion”, “offensive”, “attack”, or “assault.” There is consensus that Azerbaijan was the one who initiated the hostilities. Some talk about “Azerbaijan’s Invasion of Armenia”, “Azerbaijan’s Offensive on Armenia”, “Azerbaijan’s Attack on Armenia”, but they all agree on one thing: Azerbaijan was the initiator of the clash, and it was Azerbaijan who attacked. Therefore, the title “Attack of Azerbaijan on Armenia” perfectly reflects the vast majority of reliable sources and is the least ambiguous. I will provide the overwhelming evidence below: * Human Rights Watch:  :“The killings took place during fighting between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces that broke out in mid-September, when Azerbaijan made incursions into Armenia...” * Genocide Watch:  :“Azerbaijani military attacks on Armenian territory show Azerbaijani disregard for Armenian sovereignty.” * Freedom House:  :“Freedom House Condemns Azerbaijani Attacks on Armenia”  :“The Azerbaijani armed forces must immediately cease their deadly attacks on Armenian territory” * Axel Gehring, Ph.D., political scientist and expert in the field of foreign and security policy and researcher at the Institute for Critical Social Analysis of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation in Berlin:  :“On September 13, regular Azerbaijani troops launched a large-scale attack on Armenian territory. This attack took tensions between the countries to a new level.” * Laurence Broers is a specialist in conflicts in the Transcaucasus, founder of the scientific journal Caucasus Survey:  :"Azerbaijan's recent attack seeks to enforce terms in negotiations with Armenia" “ The recent large-scale cross-border attacks inside Armenia by Azerbaijan...” * Maximilian Hess, Research Fellow for Central Asia at the Foreign Policy Institute, in Foreign Policy magazine:  :“Azerbaijani forces who marched into Armenia continue to occupy part of its territory, in particular heights around the town of Jermuk.” * David L. Phillips, conflict analyst in The National Interest:  :“The United States criticized Azerbaijan's recent attacks on Armenia proper” * European Parliament Resolution:  :“Strongly condemns the latest military aggression by Azerbaijan on September 12, 2022 on the sovereign territory of Armenia”  :“calls on the Azerbaijani authorities, therefore, to immediately withdraw from all parts of the territory of Armenia “ * Wojciech Gorecki, senior researcher at the Department of Turkey, Caucasus and Central Asia:  :“in September 2022 Azerbaijan attacked targets located on Armenian territory.” * The Guardian:  : “This week, with attention focused across the Black Sea in Ukraine, fighting on the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia killed about 100 troops after Azerbaijan shelled a number of towns in Armenia, with both sides accusing each other of “provocations”.” * Der Spiegel:  : “Peace negotiations mediated by the European Union have been at an impasse since Baku also attacked territory in the Republic of Armenia in September 2022.” * TIME:  : “...democratic nation that was recently invaded by its authoritarian neighbor”  : “...but also Armenia, which has been suffering from Azerbaijan's invasion for almost three weeks now.” * BBC:  : “I don’t think anyone doubts that Azerbaijan started this operation on the territory of Armenia. Even Azerbaijani commentators admit this. Armenia is currently weak, has little interest in disrupting the status quo.” * Eurasianet  :"Azerbaijan launches large-scale attacks on Armenia"  :“Azerbaijan launched a large-scale attack on targets in Armenia, an unprecedented expansion of the long-running conflict into Armenian territory.” * Michael Rubin, senior researcher at AIP:  :“Last week, Azerbaijan attacked Armenia proper. (Last week Azerbaijan attacked Armenia directly)” * Paul Stronski is a senior fellow in the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Programs, specializing in Russia and the South Caucasus:  : “..the fact that Russia is preoccupied, certainly led to what looks like an Azerbaijani offensive at this time”  : “And what we even saw just in the last few days is actually attacks inside and shelling inside cities inside Armenia, not just along the border." * Kapil Komireddy, political columnist for The Telegraph:  : “But so little about Azerbaijan's attack, which goes beyond the disputed territory of Karabakh and targets Armenia proper.” *Seth Franzman, Middle East analyst for The Jerusalem Post , contributor to Defense News, The National Interest and Digest of Middle East Studies:  :“Attacks on Armenia represent dangerous escalation” *Carnegie Europe:  :“Nearly 300 soldiers died in a large-scale Azerbaijani incursion into the territory of Armenia on September 13-14.” Vanezi (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bhavana (actress) → Bhavana (actress, born 1986) – (Discuss) – WP:PDAB versus Bhavana (Kannada actress) not justified. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ToadetteEdit! 11:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Heptanese school (painting) → Ionian school (painting) – (Discuss) – The term Ionian seems to be more than 10X more common than Heptanese for these topics. Dicklyon (talk) 03:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 03:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Volodarsk, Ukraine → Vedmezhe – (Discuss) – Due to the modern name of the settlement, since 2016. See: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1351-19#Text Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1988 executions of Iranian political prisoners → 1988 Iran prison massacre – (Discuss) – Massacre is the WP:COMMONNAME by academics, journalists, and by human rights organizations, more than 30 years after the event, with plenty of time for the dust to settle on a name. It's also a WP:EUPHEMISM for an event in which up to 30,000 people were killed for apparently their political views, in what Amnesty International described as crimes against humanity in 2018. See Amnesty International, Abdorrahman Boroumand Center, Human Rights Watch, Geneva International Centre for Justice, BBC, France24, UPI, group of senior United Nations officials and Nobel prize winners, Telegraph; scholar Nasser Mohajer, report of the inquiry by academic Geoffrey Robertson, scholar Reza Afshari; more than enough WP:RS. Longhornsg (talk) 03:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 04:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Philip of Sweden → Philip, King of Sweden – (Discuss) – Per consistency with other Swedish kings who were without a regnal number, such as Birger, King of Sweden, Valdemar, King of Sweden, and Albert, King of Sweden. 2601:249:9301:D570:940A:52B5:CCA9:A4A3 (talk) 04:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Majority favorite criterion → majority criterion – (Discuss) – To stay consistent with the names at Wikipedia, I recommend that this page should be moved to "majority criterion" or "majority winner criterion". There are already the Condorcet winner criterion, the Condorcet loser criterion, and the majority loser criterion. Who uses the term "majority favorite criterion" anyway? Markus Schulze 18:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Recognition of same-sex unions in Liechtenstein → Same-sex marriage in Liechtenstein – (Discuss) – Consistency with other SSM articles. Doomdorm64 (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inconfidência Mineira → Minas Gerais Conspiracy – (Discuss) – English name, or some variation of it. Torimem (talk) 20:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 03:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Israel–Hamas war → Gaza War (2023–present) – (Discuss) – The previous discussion has concluded that WP:COMMONNAME does not stand as other names are also in common use. In such case, WP:COMMONNAME states that When there is no single, obvious name that is demonstrably the most frequently used for the topic by these sources, editors should reach a consensus as to which title is best by considering these criteria directly. I believe the proposed title is better in consistency; previous wars involving Gaza, Gaza War (2008–2009) and 2014 Gaza War, use Gaza War in the title, so this article should also follow suit. NasssaNser 03:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 28, 2024[edit]

References

  1. ^ https://www.cfr.org/article/sunni-shia-divide#:~:text=Shias%2C%20a%20term%20that%20stems,succession%20based%20on%20Mohammed%27s%20bloodline.
  2. ^ https://www.history.com/news/sunni-shia-divide-islam-muslim
  3. ^ https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/11/Shias-Sunnis-religious-conflict-full-report.pdf
  4. ^ https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2007/02/12/7332087/the-origins-of-the-shiite-sunni-split
  5. ^ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-16047709
  6. ^ https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-sunni-shiite-divide-in-the-middle-east-is-about-nationalism-not-a-conflict-within-islam/
  7. ^ https://www.vox.com/2016/1/5/10718456/sunni-shia
  8. ^ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2014/06/18/the-sunni-shia-divide-where-they-live-what-they-believe-and-how-they-view-each-other/
  9. ^ https://www.npr.org/2007/02/12/7280905/chronology-a-history-of-the-shia-sunni-split
  10. ^ https://www.bbc.com/news/av/magazine-27945271
  11. ^ https://www.fpri.org/article/2013/12/the-geopolitics-of-the-sunni-shii-divide-in-the-middle-east/
  12. ^ https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Other/15-F-0940_DOC_05_CSBA-LTSG_Sunni-Shia_Divide_Origins_Theology_Geopolitics_200701.pdf
  13. ^ https://origins.osu.edu/article/tradition-vs-charisma-sunni-shii-divide-muslim-world?language_content_entity=en
  14. ^ https://carnegie-mec.org/posts/2007/03/the-shia-sunni-divide-myths-and-reality?lang=en&center=middle-east
  15. ^ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346724893_Sunni-Shia_Division_in_Islam_Its_Origin_Development_Political_Socio-Economic_Implications_Contemporary_Relations
  16. ^ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/04/sunni-shia-sectarianism-middle-east-islam
  17. ^ https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691186610/sunnis-and-shia
  18. ^ https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep03717.6.pdf
Completely Random Guy (talk) 15:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Polyamorph (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deadstar (talk) 08:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elapsed listings[edit]

The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.

Backlog[edit]

Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.

Time could not be ascertained[edit]

Malformed requests[edit]

See "Bot considerations"
  • Talk:Early Cholas – Original timestamp could not be ascertained; check relisting syntax

Possibly incomplete requests[edit]

See "Request all associated moves explicitly"

References[edit]

References generally should not appear here. Use {{reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Current_discussions_(alt)&oldid=1227174357"